Quebec’s prime minister, François Legault, defended the legislation, arguing that it had the help of most residents, was not geared toward any faith, and was one other step in secularizing the province the place the Catholic Church exercised for thus lengthy an extreme affect. He mentioned public servants mustn’t put on symbols that would promote their religion whereas serving the general public.
However critics have hailed the legislation as an assault on spiritual minorities and freedom of expression, including that it disproportionately influenced Muslim lecturers carrying hijabs.
The legislation is anticipated to achieve the supreme courtroom of Canada.
The courtroom’s emotional hearings, which started in November, introduced testimonies from a number of girls who mentioned the legislation had derailed their lives and careers or nullified any hope of progress.
Blanchard referred to his testimony within the determination, and wrote that “there is no such thing as a doubt” that the legislation “has severe and damaging penalties for all those that put on spiritual symbols in public.”
Amrit Kaur, a Sikh girl from Quebec, mentioned Within the Washington Put up in 2019 she graduated from a highschool instructor the day Invoice 21 handed. As a substitute of taking off his turban to work in his native province, he moved throughout the nation to take a job in British Columbia.
“I’m very happy that immediately’s determination permits lecturers like me to work in Quebec’s English training system,” Kaur mentioned in an announcement Tuesday.
“Nonetheless, this victory is bittersweet since French college lecturers, police and attorneys can not even work with their articles of religion. Invoice 21 continues to pose an unprecedented problem to minorities in Quebec. “.